<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What does Google Sidewiki mean for brands and PR?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.immediatefuture.co.uk/what-does-google-sidewiki-mean-for-brands-and-pr/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.immediatefuture.co.uk/what-does-google-sidewiki-mean-for-brands-and-pr/</link>
	<description>Redefining PR</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 11:21:14 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Lance</title>
		<link>http://blog.immediatefuture.co.uk/what-does-google-sidewiki-mean-for-brands-and-pr/comment-page-1/#comment-925</link>
		<dc:creator>Lance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 17:30:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.immediatefuture.co.uk/?p=233#comment-925</guid>
		<description>Sharon - my gut feeling is that in its current form it won&#039;t make a lot of impact, because this kind of shared site annotation has been tried before and I think people just aren&#039;t that interested in it.

That said, you should never write off anything Google throws its weight behind and, as I said in the post, there&#039;s every possibility of a third party app adding some value which could suddenly make Sidewiki a lot more interesting for people. 

I still argue that if you visit a brand&#039;s website, you&#039;re probably mainly interested in the content of that website rather than what other people have to say about it - but maybe this will change if usage of Sidewiki grows and evolves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sharon &#8211; my gut feeling is that in its current form it won&#8217;t make a lot of impact, because this kind of shared site annotation has been tried before and I think people just aren&#8217;t that interested in it.</p>
<p>That said, you should never write off anything Google throws its weight behind and, as I said in the post, there&#8217;s every possibility of a third party app adding some value which could suddenly make Sidewiki a lot more interesting for people. </p>
<p>I still argue that if you visit a brand&#8217;s website, you&#8217;re probably mainly interested in the content of that website rather than what other people have to say about it &#8211; but maybe this will change if usage of Sidewiki grows and evolves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sharon Clews</title>
		<link>http://blog.immediatefuture.co.uk/what-does-google-sidewiki-mean-for-brands-and-pr/comment-page-1/#comment-924</link>
		<dc:creator>Sharon Clews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 13:19:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.immediatefuture.co.uk/?p=233#comment-924</guid>
		<description>Hey Lance,
Great post, thank you. I will admit when I first read it I thought, **it, I should be aware of this! Your points about not panicking them worked for me! Although I am not sure I agree with your thoughts on people wanting to read the website and not the Sidewicki.....isn&#039;t that how Twitter &amp; Facebook got so popular, voyeurism?! :)

Not quite sure what it will ADD, but like anything we will all make our choices on whether or not it will provide value or just gossip!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Lance,<br />
Great post, thank you. I will admit when I first read it I thought, **it, I should be aware of this! Your points about not panicking them worked for me! Although I am not sure I agree with your thoughts on people wanting to read the website and not the Sidewicki&#8230;..isn&#8217;t that how Twitter &amp; Facebook got so popular, voyeurism?! <img src='http://blog.immediatefuture.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Not quite sure what it will ADD, but like anything we will all make our choices on whether or not it will provide value or just gossip!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rax Lakhani</title>
		<link>http://blog.immediatefuture.co.uk/what-does-google-sidewiki-mean-for-brands-and-pr/comment-page-1/#comment-922</link>
		<dc:creator>Rax Lakhani</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 16:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.immediatefuture.co.uk/?p=233#comment-922</guid>
		<description>Hi Lance

Great post, as usual!

Here&#039;s a little piece I did on this very topic a few weeks ago based on an article that Mark Borkowski did in the Guardian. Take a look at the poll results...

http://raxraxrax.com/2009/11/09/google-sidewiki-are-you-monitoring/ 

Rax</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Lance</p>
<p>Great post, as usual!</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a little piece I did on this very topic a few weeks ago based on an article that Mark Borkowski did in the Guardian. Take a look at the poll results&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://raxraxrax.com/2009/11/09/google-sidewiki-are-you-monitoring/" rel="nofollow">http://raxraxrax.com/2009/11/09/google-sidewiki-are-you-monitoring/</a> </p>
<p>Rax</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
